| Not Guilty on ALL Counts |
 Blog For Free! Archives Home 2007 April 2007 January 2006 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2005 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2003 December 2003 November My Links Bobby Joe Daft and Demented AESav - AE's new home Joolieblog II Krazedone's Blog Irishred (aka ApplesnOranges) Andaloo Sillygrrl Crap Pix - Really Briggsy Anagamesx's Blog Susan of Pudlin and the "Puds" Fotocali on tblog Fark all day - you know you want to Lynne (aka ThingsIKnow) Big Doral Mark's Life Flaring and her Fish that were once Fry Ladyblog Tenkin - not to be forgotten Hhunter's Blog The Original Natblog Nattoons's Blog tBlog My Profile Send tMail My tFriends My Images Sponsored Blog 
|
posted by: dustyjumpwings (reply) post date: 06.13.05 (12:26 pm) There's no way I can believe he's not guilty. But after OJ, I knew they wouldn't convict him. If you have little boys in your bed to drink milk and "tell stories" on Neverland Ranch, don't you think there's something...not RIGHT, about that? *siiiigh* posted by: dangerkitty (reply) post date: 06.13.05 (12:41 pm) Reply to: dustyjumpwings As in the OJ trial, the prosecution did not deliver a convincing case. There were too many lies, retractions and the prosecution witnesses all had axes to grind. I'm not surprised. Too much reasonable doubt. You and I both know there's something seriously wrong with Michael but the burden of proof in the courts is fortunately higher. I say fortunately because I don't trust my own judgement given my own personal prejudices and lack of knowledge of the case. posted by: dilerious (reply) post date: 06.13.05 (1:27 pm) basically, if i had little boys in my bed i would have been in jail in like 27 seconds. wat a load. here look at this: http://www.rotten.com/library/bio/entertainers/music/michael-jackson/ posted by: kreativekat (reply) post date: 06.13.05 (3:20 pm) oh I'm sure we'll see him back in court again. This isn't over. I'm pretty sure of it. I think there is some truth behind the allegations. posted by: BobbyJoe (reply) post date: 06.14.05 (12:30 pm) Kitty's right, "reasonable doubt", "burden of proof"... I think some witnesses got paid off. That's the only explination for such a shoddy prosecution. The jury did its job. "Not guilty" was the only verdict they were left with. posted by: EvilEye (reply) post date: 06.14.05 (7:17 pm) I did the moonwalk when I heard about it. posted by: surrogate (reply) post date: 06.15.05 (9:58 am) well put! posted by: dangerkitty (reply) post date: 06.15.05 (10:20 am) Reply to: surrogate thank you |
 Ayn Rant: AESav.net  Daft and Demented: Mal Uncensored  Captain Jack Sparrow Shop DangerKitty on Zazzle.com  |
The jury just handed out an unambigous comprehensive defeat to the prosecution in the Michael Jackson molestation trial. People outside the courthouse are dancing. I, like many of my friends, didn't follow the trial too closely but still kept an ear open.